Kapeesh Law Chambers successfully settled a matter in a Copyright infringement case between two body Corporates

 Celebrating Achievement: Kapeesh Law Chambers peacefully settled a Commercial Dispute


At Kapeesh Law Chambers, we pride ourselves on our seasoned advocates who consistently deliver unparalleled results for our clients. Our latest success story is a testament to our unwavering commitment to excellence and client satisfaction. In a long pending commercial dispute, our adept legal team, led by Advocate Akash Awana, successfully settled the case in favor of our client, Morni Handlooms, against Morni Sarees Pvt Ltd.


Case Overview: Morni Sarees Pvt Ltd vs. Morni Handloom


Case Details:


Case Name: Morni Sarees Pvt Ltd vs. Morni Handloom


Date: 08-06-2023


Court: District Judge (Commercial Court), North West/Rohini/Delhi


Advocates: Sh. Ankur Tiwari (Counsel for Plaintiff),

Sh. Akash Awana (Counsel for Defendant)


Application: Under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC


The Dispute & Settlement:


Morni Sarees Pvt Ltd filed a suit for permanent injunction, alleging trademark infringement, passing off, damages, and other claims against Morni Handloom. The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from using the trademark "MORNI," which they claimed was identical or deceptively similar to their registered trademark, thus causing potential confusion among consumers.


On the date of the hearing, both parties jointly moved an application under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, indicating that they had reached a settlement. The court, after perusing the file and hearing the counsel, recorded the statements of the parties and acknowledged the settlement agreement (Ex.S1). The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff based on the terms of the settlement.


Key Outcomes:


1. Injunction: The defendant, Morni Handloom, was restrained from using the trademark/trade name "MORNI" or any mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s registered trademark.


2. Settlement Agreement: The settlement agreement (Ex.S1) was made an integral part of the court’s order.


3. Court Fee Refund: The court ordered a refund of the court fee as per the rules.


KLC Advocate’s Role:


Akash Awana is the Managing Partner at KLC, whose expertise and strategic approach were instrumental in achieving a favorable settlement. His meticulous preparation and negotiation skills ensured that the interests of Morni Handloom were safeguarded while also facilitating a mutually beneficial resolution.


At Kapeesh Law Chambers, we understand the complexities of commercial disputes and the importance of protecting our clients' intellectual property. Our team of seasoned advocates is dedicated to providing top-notch legal representation, ensuring our clients' rights are upheld, and their business interests are protected.


The successful settlement of the Morni Sarees Pvt Ltd vs. Morni Handloom case underscores our commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients. At Kapeesh Law Chambers, we continue to set the bar high, delivering success through expertise, dedication, and strategic excellence.


For more information about our services or to discuss how we can assist with your legal needs, please contact us at Kapeesh Law Chambers. (admin@kapeeshlawchambers.com)


Victory in the courtroom, satisfaction for our clients – that’s the Kapeesh Law Chambers duty.


Kapeesh Law Chambers 

Lawyers Chamber Block-II,

Delhi High Court, New Delhi-110003

admin@kapeeshlawchambers.com

www.kapeeshlawchambers.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Removing the Corporate Veil: An Analysis of Recent Precedents and Judgments

  Introduction   The doctrine of separate legal entity is a cornerstone of corporate law. Established in the landmark case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd (1897), this principle dictates that a company is distinct from its shareholders and directors. However, there are situations where courts "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil to hold individuals accountable for the company’s actions. The concept of removing the corporate veil is a legal remedy invoked in circumstances involving fraud, malfeasance, or where justice demands it.   This article delves into the modern evolution of this doctrine, analyzing recent cases and judicial trends that shed light on when and how the corporate veil can be lifted.     The Principle of Corporate Veil   In Salomon v Salomon, the House of Lords reinforced the notion that a company enjoys a distinct legal identity. Mr. Salomon, a boot manufacturer, transferred his business to a newly formed company in wh...
Read more

Framing of Charges in Criminal Proceedings: An Overview and Remedies Available to the Accused for Dismissal (with BNSS Provisions)

Introduction In criminal jurisprudence, the framing of charges represents a critical stage of a trial. This process is a formal declaration by the court outlining the specific accusations made against the accused. It ensures that the accused knows the charges they face, which enables them to prepare an appropriate defense. The objective is to maintain fairness and transparency within the legal framework. The recent enactment of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) introduces certain new provisions that aim to make the process more efficient and less cumbersome.     What is the Framing of Charges?   Framing of charges occurs after the investigation is complete and the prosecution has submitted its charge sheet to the court. If the court finds prima facie evidence, it frames charges against the accused. This marks the beginning of the formal trial, where the accused can plead guilty or contest the charges.   Under the new framework of the BNSS, pro...
Read more

Ignorance of Law is No Excuse: A Detailed Analysis with Reference to Recent Supreme Court Judgments

Introduction The Legal maxim " Ignorantia juris non excusat” or “Ignorance of law is no excuse” is a fundamental principle in Indian jurisprudence, ensuring that ignorance of the law does not exempt individuals or entities from legal liability. This doctrine is crucial for the maintenance of the rule of law, ensuring uniform application and enforcement. Concept The principle that ignorance of the law does not excuse wrongdoing has its origins in Roman law and is firmly embedded in common law traditions. The assumption is that laws are publicly accessible and that all individuals have a responsibility to inform themselves about the legal requirements governing their actions. In India, this principle is a cornerstone of the legal system, upheld consistently across various legal forums, including the Supreme Court. Recent Supreme Court Judgments A notable reaffirmation of this principle came in the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Union of ...
Read more