Rules for Good Samaritan and Bad Samaritan in the Indian Motor Vehicle Act

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, governs road transport and ensures safety, traffic regulation, and penalties for violations in India. The 2019 amendment to the Act brought significant reforms, including provisions for "Good Samaritans" to encourage citizens to assist accident victims without fear of harassment. Additionally, the concept of a "Bad Samaritan" can be considered in legal terms, although it is not explicitly defined in the Act.

 

 Good Samaritan (Section 134A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988)

 

Definition: A "Good Samaritan" refers to a person who, in good faith and without any expectation of reward or compensation, helps an accident victim on the road by providing medical assistance, taking them to the hospital, or informing the police.

 

 Legal Provisions for Good Samaritans

 

1. Protection from Legal Hassles (Section 134A): Good Samaritans are granted protection from any civil or criminal liability arising from their actions of helping accident victims. No person who helps an injured victim should face harassment, questioning, or be forced to provide any legal evidence unless they choose to.

 

2. Rights of a Good Samaritan:

   - Anonymity: A Good Samaritan can choose to remain anonymous, not revealing their identity if they prefer.

   - Voluntary Participation: The Good Samaritan is not compelled to attend court or police station unless they voluntarily agree.

   - No Obligation to Pay Costs: The Good Samaritan is not liable to pay for any medical or other expenses for the victim.

 

3. The Good Samaritan Guidelines, 2016 (based on the Supreme Court directive):

   - No coercion: Hospitals are required to admit accident victims brought in by a Good Samaritan and provide immediate treatment without waiting for legal formalities.

   - Police Responsibility: The police should handle the Good Samaritan with due respect and should not harass or question them unnecessarily.

 

 Bad Samaritan Concept (Unethical Bystander)

 

Although not legally codified as "Bad Samaritan," the law indirectly discourages neglect in helping accident victims. Failing to report an accident or deliberately causing harm can have legal implications. For instance:

 

1. Failure to Report an Accident (Section 134 of the Motor Vehicles Act): The driver or the person in charge of a vehicle involved in an accident must inform the nearest police station and provide medical aid to the victim. Failure to do so is punishable under the Act.

 

2. Negligence or Avoidance: If an individual deliberately avoids helping an accident victim, they may face criticism under the law of negligence, but there is no direct penalty under the Motor Vehicles Act for bystanders failing to act. However, common law in India holds that negligence and failure to provide assistance can lead to moral and social consequences.

 

Compensation Procedure before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT)

 

In case of an accident, victims or their legal representatives can approach the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) for compensation. The MACT was established to ensure speedy and effective compensation for accident victims. Here's the procedure involved:

 

 1. Filing a Claim Petition

 

A claim can be filed by:

- The victim or the legal heirs in case of death

- The owner of the damaged property

- A third-party insurance claimant

 

Documents Required:

- Police reports (FIR, accident details)

- Medical records and hospital bills

- Death certificates (in case of fatal accidents)

- Insurance policy papers

- Vehicle registration details

 

 2. Investigation by the Tribunal

Once the claim is filed, the tribunal investigates the matter to establish:

- The occurrence of the accident

- The extent of injury or damage

- Who is at fault

- The quantum of compensation sought

 

The tribunal may rely on police records, witnesses, medical evidence, and insurance documents.

 

 3. Types of Compensation

 

Compensation can be claimed for:

- Bodily Injuries: Compensation is calculated based on medical expenses, loss of income, and future treatment costs.

- Death Claims: Legal representatives of the deceased can claim compensation based on the deceased's income, dependency, and funeral costs.

- Property Damage: In case of vehicle damage, repair costs are considered.

 

 4. Interim Relief

 

Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act provides for no-fault liability compensation. This means the claimant does not need to prove the negligence of the accused party, and the tribunal can award interim compensation based on initial assessment.

 

- For death: ₹50,000

- For permanent disability: ₹25,000

 

This amount can be claimed under Section 140 without waiting for the final outcome of the case.

 

 5. Final Award by the Tribunal

 

Once the tribunal completes its investigation, it decides the total compensation based on:

- Severity of injury or loss

- Future loss of income

- Medical expenses incurred

- Age, occupation, and family status of the victim

- Impact on the quality of life

 

 6. Time Frame for Filing a Claim

 

Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the claim must be filed within six months from the date of the accident. However, courts have the discretion to condone delay if justified.

 

 7. Settlement Through Insurance

 

If the vehicle involved in the accident is insured, the insurance company will be made a party to the case. The insurer may settle the claim with or without a tribunal's intervention, depending on the facts.

 

 8. Appeal Process

 

Any party aggrieved by the tribunal’s award can appeal to the High Court within 90 days from the date of the award under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

 

 Conclusion

 

India's legal framework provides robust protection for Good Samaritans under the Motor Vehicles Act. The procedural safeguards in place ensure that individuals who assist accident victims are not harassed. Compensation for accident victims is streamlined through the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, ensuring that victims receive due compensation efficiently. At the same time, negligence in reporting or aiding an accident victim can have legal and moral implications. The combination of legal protections, tribunal mechanisms, and insurance systems creates a comprehensive system for road accident cases in India.



Stay Connected: 

Kapeesh Law Chambers 
Lawyers Chamber Block-II,
Delhi High Court, New Delhi-110003
admin@kapeeshlawchambers.com
www.kapeeshlawchambers.com

Location: Delhi, India

Popular posts from this blog

Removing the Corporate Veil: An Analysis of Recent Precedents and Judgments

  Introduction   The doctrine of separate legal entity is a cornerstone of corporate law. Established in the landmark case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd (1897), this principle dictates that a company is distinct from its shareholders and directors. However, there are situations where courts "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil to hold individuals accountable for the company’s actions. The concept of removing the corporate veil is a legal remedy invoked in circumstances involving fraud, malfeasance, or where justice demands it.   This article delves into the modern evolution of this doctrine, analyzing recent cases and judicial trends that shed light on when and how the corporate veil can be lifted.     The Principle of Corporate Veil   In Salomon v Salomon, the House of Lords reinforced the notion that a company enjoys a distinct legal identity. Mr. Salomon, a boot manufacturer, transferred his business to a newly formed company in wh...
Read more

Framing of Charges in Criminal Proceedings: An Overview and Remedies Available to the Accused for Dismissal (with BNSS Provisions)

Introduction In criminal jurisprudence, the framing of charges represents a critical stage of a trial. This process is a formal declaration by the court outlining the specific accusations made against the accused. It ensures that the accused knows the charges they face, which enables them to prepare an appropriate defense. The objective is to maintain fairness and transparency within the legal framework. The recent enactment of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) introduces certain new provisions that aim to make the process more efficient and less cumbersome.     What is the Framing of Charges?   Framing of charges occurs after the investigation is complete and the prosecution has submitted its charge sheet to the court. If the court finds prima facie evidence, it frames charges against the accused. This marks the beginning of the formal trial, where the accused can plead guilty or contest the charges.   Under the new framework of the BNSS, pro...
Read more

Ignorance of Law is No Excuse: A Detailed Analysis with Reference to Recent Supreme Court Judgments

Introduction The Legal maxim " Ignorantia juris non excusat” or “Ignorance of law is no excuse” is a fundamental principle in Indian jurisprudence, ensuring that ignorance of the law does not exempt individuals or entities from legal liability. This doctrine is crucial for the maintenance of the rule of law, ensuring uniform application and enforcement. Concept The principle that ignorance of the law does not excuse wrongdoing has its origins in Roman law and is firmly embedded in common law traditions. The assumption is that laws are publicly accessible and that all individuals have a responsibility to inform themselves about the legal requirements governing their actions. In India, this principle is a cornerstone of the legal system, upheld consistently across various legal forums, including the Supreme Court. Recent Supreme Court Judgments A notable reaffirmation of this principle came in the Supreme Court's decision in M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. Union of ...
Read more